Health Care Practitioners' Attitudes and Knowledge Regarding Trial of Labour After Cesarean Delivery (TOLAC): A Survey of Canadian Obstetrical Care Providers.

OBJECTIVES: To understand current attitudes and practice patterns of obstetrical care providers regarding trial of labour after cesarean (TOLAC) and to assess misconceptions regarding eligibility for and risks associated with TOLAC. METHODS: A survey was developed based on published literature, validated by a statistician, and piloted with Canadian obstetricians. French and English versions were distributed via the mailing list of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada and social media. Practising obstetrical care providers with an office antenatal practice were eligible to participate. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlational and multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 381 people responded, with representation from every Canadian province and territory. Obstetrician-gynaecologists (239, 63%), family physicians (100, 26%), and midwives (42, 11%) responded. Most participants (277, 78%) thought that TOLAC should be actively encouraged. Only 141 (40%) used a decision aid when counselling patients, although most respondents (250, 71%) thought it would be useful. Providers were less comfortable offering oxytocin induction compared with cervical foley or amniotomy (P < 0.001) and offering TOLAC to patients with an unknown uterine scar (P < 0.001). Providers in western Canada reported more comfort offering TOLAC to patients with more than 1 previous cesarean delivery compared with other regions. Two hundred nine participants (62%) reported that they had had at least 1 patient with a uterine rupture, with the minority of cases (13, 6%) resulting in litigation. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers new information on current national practice patterns and provider attitudes regarding TOLAC. These results can be used to guide future educational initiatives to increase TOLAC rates.

Perceptions of safety culture and recording in the operating room: understanding barriers to video data capture.

OBJECTIVE: Recording in the operating room is an important tool to help surgical teams improve their performance. This is becoming more feasible using the Operating Room Black Box, a comprehensive data capture platform. Operating room (OR) staff, however, may voice reasonable concerns as recording initiatives are implemented. The objective of this study was to assess pre-implementation attitudes of OR staff toward operative recording and explore the relationship of these attitudes to the themes of (1) safety culture, (2) impostor syndrome, and (3) privacy concerns. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey study measured staff members' beliefs and opinions of operative recording and used three previously validated tools (safety attitudes questionnaire, clance impostor phenomenon scale, and dispositional privacy concern) to assess personal and professional factors. Concepts were correlated using Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Forty-three staff members participated in this study, with a response rate of 45% (n = 43/96, 20/22 nurses, 9/11 gynecologists, 14/63 anesthesiologists). Opinions of operative data capture were generally positive (5-point Likert scale, mean = 3.81, SD = 0.91). Nurses tended to have more favorable opinions of the OR Black Box as compared to gynecologists and anesthesiologists, though this did not reach statistical significance (4.15 vs. 3.67 vs 3.43, p = 0.06). Impostor syndrome characteristics correlated with concerns about litigation related to recording (r = - 0.32, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: There are personal and professional attributes of the OR team that impact perceptions of the OR Black Box and implications around privacy and litigation. Addressing these concerns may facilitate successful implementation of the OR Black Box and improve team communication and patient safety in the OR.

Utilizing the Operating Room Black Box to Characterize Intraoperative Delays, Distractions, and Threats in the Gynecology Operating Room: A Pilot Study.

Introduction Operating Room Black Box (ORBB) technology can be used to capture information during surgery for analysis and potential identification of root causes that jeopardize safety and efficiency. In this study, our objective was to identify and characterize procedural steps, intraoperative distractions, errors, and threats, as well as the non-technical skills of the team during a common minimally invasive gynecologic procedure. Methodology This was a cross-sectional pilot study of 25 patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy between May 2019 and February 2020 at a Canadian tertiary care academic hospital. Video, audio, and patient physiologic data from all procedures were obtained through a multichannel synchronized recording device (ORBB). Trained analysts reviewed and coded the recordings. Results The median total case time was 165 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]: 160-178 minutes) with the shortest step being cystoscopy and the longest being vaginal cuff closure. Time pressure and device absence or malfunction occurred in 48% of the cases, and a median of 262 (IQR: 228-304) auditory distractions were noted per case. There was a median of 3 (IQR: 2-4) safety threats identified per case and at least one error was identified in 11/25 cases (44%). Only two adverse events were noted among all 25 cases. Observed non-technical skills were mainly positive, and observations were the highest for situational awareness and leadership among the surgical team and communication and teamwork among the nursing/scrub technician and anesthesia teams. Conclusions This study is a novel application of the ORBB in the gynecology operating room to capture information regarding procedure times, intraoperative distractions, errors, and non-technical skills of the team. Frequent intraoperative cognitive and auditory distractions were noted. Although adverse events were rare, safety threats were identified. Ongoing and future research from our group will aim to identify key areas for organizational, technological, and team improvement to minimize inefficiencies and optimize patient safety in the operating room.

Decreasing Cesarean Delivery Rates Using a Trial of Labour After Cesarean (TOLAC) Bundle.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement a trial of labour after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) bundle-a group of interventions aimed at decreasing cesarean delivery (CD) for women who have had a prior CD (Robson group 5). METHODS: A TOLAC bundle was developed that included: (1) educational rounds for health care providers, (2) a physician-patient TOLAC discussion aid, and (3) patient-centred educational resources. A before-and-after study design was employed. A one-year chart review determined baseline CD rates in Robson group 5 patients at a tertiary care academic centre. Following this, from February 1, 2018 until May 31, 2019, each bundle intervention was sequentially introduced every four to six months and modified based on provider feedback. Obstetricians were provided with their individual CD rates using an audit-and-feedback approach prior to the introduction of the next intervention. RESULTS: The baseline CD rate for Robson group 5 patients was 71% (175/247 eligible patients). Following the introduction of the bundle, the CD rate decreased to 61% (131/214 eligible patients). This was a 10% decrease in the CD rate (P = 0.029). A significant increase in rate of induction was noted, from 5% pre-intervention to 11% post-intervention (p = 0.017). There were no significant decreases in the rate of vaginal birth after CD or increases in the rates of uterine rupture or NICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: A TOLAC bundle, consisting of provider education, a TOLAC discussion aid, and patient resources, combined with audit and feedback, decreased CD for Robson group 5 patients.